Dear Simon,
I believe that I’ve read every post you’ve written about shirts. Italian, Spanish, British, even the one on Charvet in How To Spend It. I’m always looking for the same thing but still haven’t found it. Maybe I missed one, maybe I didn’t.
What makes a quality shirt? Not fit, but the construction specifications that make quality. Are collars and cuffs fused or how are they supposed to be made? What parts need to be hand stitched? What are the materials that get used to make a quality shirt?
How does a quality shirt manage to hide the top button flap underneath the tie knot (poor quality shirts always seem to show some cloth and don’t allow the tie to sit between both sides of the collar).
I really hope you can help me with this because I’ve been puzzled by what makes a quality shirt for a long time and haven’t found any proper answers yet. Anywhere.
Best,
Simon Martelo
Hi Simon,
It’s a good question. One reason you haven’t found much so far is that there isn’t that much to the make of a shirt – at least not compared to a suit, or a bag.
In fact, it’s interesting that when most retailers talk about a high-quality shirt, they often mean the opposite of what the customer wants. The brand is offering a fine shirt, with more delicate material, whereas the customer wants something that will last well.
The most important things by far in a shirt are fit and style, not quality.
Still, it’s worth running through the quality points to provide context: to explain what difference each makes, and which are subjective, which objective.
Material
The fabric of a shirt is a big area – indeed one we’ve written a whole Guide to.
However, most of those points are about design, style and formality. The actual quality of a good shirting – in terms of how it will wear over time – doesn’t vary that much.
If anything, more expensive fabrics tend to be made of a finer (thinner) cotton which makes it lighter on the skin but also more delicate (like big Super-number suitings). It can also give the cotton a sheen that is rather showy.
You generally want a two-ply cotton, but only something around 80-120 thread counts – often written as 2/80 to 2/120. And most basic shirts will have that.
Buttons
Mother of pearl is nice, and certainly preferable to plastic. But where that mother of pearl comes doesn’t matter much, and more expensive ones just tend to be chunkier, which again is rather showy as well as being a little annoying to button.
As with many of these areas, what men want most is just buttons that will last and not break – and everything apart from the cheapest plastics is fine there.
Machine stitching
Some shirts have more stitches to the inch, single-needle stitching, and French seams (where the material is folded over three times and then sewn together very closely).
Functionally, having more stitches to the inch is stronger, but it makes little real difference to longevity. I’ve had fairly cheap shirts for years and the side seams have never opened.
It’s more aesthetic – neatness that you might want if you’re not paying (a lot) for hand sewing these seams. But then, you might not.
Gussets
These are the little bits that end the side seam at the bottom, stopping it coming apart (below). As with fine stitching, they are often listed as a sign of a quality shirt, but I’ve never known anyone whose shirt has split there.
Off-set side seams
Sometimes the side seam on a shirt and the sleeve seam don’t line up, because the sleeve has been turned to change its pitch. This is certainly a functional aspect, but I’ve worn shirts with it and shirts without, and never noticed a difference.
Pleats up the sleeve
When you attach a cuff to the sleeve, there is excess that must be taken in somewhere – as the cuff is smaller than the sleeve. You can do this through a few pleats, or in consistent gathering around the cuff like some Neapolitans do (below).
The latter is harder, but in no way better and too effeminate for some. There is an argument that pleats can throw fullness into the right places – perhaps around the elbow, where you need room – but it’s very minor.
Aesthetic hand-sewing
This is where a lot of money is spent at the top end of luxury shirts: hand-sewn buttonholes, hand-sewn buttons, hand-sewn side seams, hand-finished bottom hems, hand-attached plackets.
These are mostly purely aesthetic, and I would only recommend paying for them if you want the look.
Functional hand-sewing
Some hand sewing can be functional, and in my view worth paying for in an expensive shirt.
One is having the collar attached by hand, while the shirt body is on a mannequin and the collar fastened, so the whole thing is done in the round. This gives the collar a natural roundness and curve, and makes it less likely to collapse when worn.
The second is having the sleeve attached by hand. This enables a better fit as a larger sleeve can be worked into a smaller armhole – fundamental to bespoke tailoring as well. It also makes it easier to do a wider seam around the sleeve, which can be more comfortable.
Fused and floating collars
A floating lining to a collar is often listed as a sign of quality. But whether you want one or not is largely a style choice – it’s just that a floating lining is harder to make.
Personally I find floating collars uncomfortable when buttoned and too ready to collapse when open. A good fused collar will not bubble when wet, or in any other way age badly, and it curves naturally around the collar of a jacket. It is more likely to require collar stiffeners when buttoned, however.
A lot of the points I’ve said are relatively unimportant are best used as short-hand for the general care that has been taken in the making of the shirt.
Care is important. If buying a brand for the first time, there may be weaknesses in the way the shirt is sewn that you can’t see easily – such as the way the thread is knotted off after a button is sewn on.
But then again, a manufacturer may also add fancy gussets in order to distract from all the shortcuts he has taken elsewhere.
Buy shirts for their fit, then their style, then functional hand-sewing. And look after them. Don’t dry clean; hang dry; tackle stains quickly. Most shirts get stained long before their side seams rip.
The point you make, Simon, about not hiding the collar button when worn with a tie, is one of design rather than manufacturing quality.
It may be that cheaper brands put less thought into this, but then it may also be that they use a different standard shape that doesn’t work for your particular neck.
Simon, I see you’ve used an image from Drake’s who now own Cleeve of London. Do you know if Drake’s are just using the name ‘Cleeve of London’ for their MTM shirts? Because as I understood it Cleeve made shirts in quantity for other brands and were not a ‘one off’ MTM shirtmaker (please correct me if I am wrong). Finally, have you ordered a shirt yet from Drake’s since they acquired Cleve of London, if so how was it? Thank you for your help.
Hey Dominic – yes Cleeve are carrying on making for other brands, and I’m actually in the process of having a bespoke one made, so watch this space!
Hi Simon
Other than the odd shirt you wear which seems to be ‘perfect’ – see your post dated 22nd August, for me most shirts seem to have their own inherent problems. With me it is the rolling of the collar tip when wearing a tie which is made worse by using a collar pin but why is this occurring? In your blog mentioned above, your shirt sits high and is perfect even though you are not wearing a tie. As this is another problem i have with shirts (they lay flat) I thought i may come up with my own solution to have a press stud or button and tab concealed under the collar that could be used when not wearing a tie so that it keeps the collar up when wearing a jacket as they always seem to splay open and disappear under the jacket collar which is very unattractive.
Any help on this problem would be appreciated other than bespoke as it is out of my budget range.
Bradley
Bradley, I’ve found Hilditch & Key shirts to be my end-all shirt, and having tried to get them copied in Hong Kong, I’ve realised why. The secret collar stiffner!
Shirtmakers can copy the exact details of stitching, collar shape and size, and position of the stiffner-inserts, but a Hilditch & Key collar has a very thin and quite soft ‘stiffner’ embedded in the very front edge, that goes from the collar point, to about 5/8″ from the top. This serves the purpose of avoiding collar-point-curl, which happens with Tyrwhitt, Pink, etc. but more importantly it keeps the bottom part of the collar stiff enough to stand on its own, almost vertically out of the top of a jacket, when worn without a tie. I’ve worn these shirts for over fifteen years without realising this one detail of construction until I tried many times to copy it, and failed.
I’ll also add that a H&K shirt stands apart from most in that the collar is quite deep. i.e. 2″ at the back, so it sits quite high up the neck, which looks good, and also helps with the structure when worn tie-less.
Simon,
This is a really good summary post! I like the fact it allows a layman (‘me’) to rapidly ‘value’ the important vs unimportant when judging price vs value in a plain English style.
I know there will be lots of people who read this who will say purchase “efficiently” priced shirt for the office vs. something a bit more special for their own wedding and will want to know what to look for and where to spend the money.
As someone who has always wanted to try the finest out there and then dial back down on the curve of diminishing returns to something that I believe is a give more ‘value’, I have found the above really useful and think it could be the start of a good sticky thread similarly written on the major areas e.g. shoes, suits etc. that then link to your more detailed posts on the more subtle nuance found in bespoke items.
Thank you again for the blog.
Thanks Rich, and good idea
Don’t dry clean? May I ask why not?
It shortens the life of the shirt – wears it down much faster. It does involve putting it in a massive drum of chemicals after all
Do you (or others) have any recommendations as to the best way to care for shirts to keep them in good condition, for example:
1. What sort of detergent, pre-treatment, wash cycle, temperature etc is best?
2. What about ironing (what sort of iron, how wet the shirt, any recommendation as to method)?
3. Other relevant points for care – eg avoiding sweat / yellow stains around the armpits, crunchy armpits (caused by deodorant?).
A bigger post at some point Angus, but broadly you shouldn’t have to do much to pre-treat shirts. Just wash at 40 degrees to deal with any odour etc, and wash inside out. You can put some extra detergent on the armpits if that’s a problem
Ironing is a big topic, almost an art in itself! But the biggest thing is just having it a little damp before you start
Hi Simon – ‘high street’ shirts which are your favourite/best value?
I haven’t tried enough to have a view I’m afraid, and not for a few years.
Simon,
Thank you for another excellent and very practical article that will help men immensely in understanding what’s important to consider about shirts.
Simon thank you very much for answering this. It’s all clear now. One last thing, do you know which brands have a floating interlining collar? I’m guessing Kiton, Charvet, Borrelli…maybe even Steffano Ricci?
I only own Kiton and Charvet, but no: Italians tend to be fused, so Kiton and Borrelli will be fused, and probably Ricci. Charvet is floating.
Dear Mr. Simon,
I have read with interest all that you wrote and I agree with most of your comments (but not all). I just want add a note to your comment on italian collars: some artisans in Italy still make the not fused collar. They haven’t big names in the world, but they are really artisans with a ancient work processing.
Thanks for your very interesting blog.
Best
Roberta
Thanks Roberta
On first reading this post I went “Wow!”.
Why?
Because it succinctly and honestly addresses the broad and detail aspects of what to look for when buying a shirt.
You even , dare I say , very bravely contradict what I believe you’ve written before.
I myself have got lost in the world of double stitches, single needle, stitches per inch etc etc……. and then sat back and thought “hold on when was the last time a shirt of mine ever ripped at the seams or stitches or had a button break”
These matters are quite rightly inconsequential.
Even most of my high street shirts of many a year are in good repair.
The only thing I find is that shirts look tired and faded with time.
And to this end I’m surprised you say material doesn’t matter. I would think in this regard it does. Your thoughts?
From what you’ve written I’ve concluded that a TM Lewin or M & S or Charles Twyhitt shirt of a good fit would out do the need for bespoke.
Unless of course someone is beyond an average fit.
Again , your thoughts?
Finally, thank you , thank you for addressing this subject so honestly and so well as it can be read by anyone regardless of budget.
A master class on the subject.
Please, more frequent articles like this.
Thanks, pleased it’s useful.
Shirts are unlikely to wear better with more expensive materials. More important is looking after them well (no dry cleaning, no tumble drying etc) and simply having enough of them – wearing them every week simply means they will wear out fast.
I’d still advocate bespoke, if you are anywhere near considering a bespoke suit. But the best value bespoke (eg Satriano Cinque with only functional hand work), or good MTM if you can find a process that produces a good fit for you.
Simon – have you got any views on/experiences of Boggi’s shirts? I’ve tried most of the rtw offerings on Jermyn St and, for me (which is of course personal and body-specific), they stand out for doing slim or “tailored” fit in a slightly closer fitting way than the English makers. Fit aside, however, I’m not that impressed at all. I remember ironing a Boggi shirt some time ago and noticing a “Made In China” label! I checked the few shirts from them that I have and it’s ubiquitous. As the RRP is somewhere between £69 and 99, I’d expect more than this for the money. Also, I’ve noticed that the Boggi shirts don’t have spaces for collar stiffeners – they appear to have something sewn into the collar instead. Is this an Italian thing? (I’ve notice this in a couple of New & Lingwood casual shirts but haven’t seen it anywhere else) Or is it just a money-saver? From my experience, it doesn’t seem to help the collar keep its shape that much. I fear Boggi is a case of style over substance/manufacturing quality – a little bit like Brooks Brothers in that regard.
No experience, but note: being made in china doesn’t necessarily mean poor quality; having a sewn-in stiffener is only really a problem if you want to take them out…
Simon,
This really is a fascinating subject that can be discussed and debated ad nauseum I’m sure. For example, today I have on a a Zegna shirt that was made to measure for me from the company’s su misura custom line. The fit is excellent and the construction appears to be very well done. The collar and sleeve attachments I’m sure were done by machine, yet feel very soft and look nice and rounded. The buttons are great and attached beautifully,but again by machine. I’ve had this shirt for four years and have laundered it properly and rotated its wearing as you suggest. The net result being that the shirt still looks fantastic.
So, I really wonder if there really is that much practical difference between a bespoke shirt and a quality made MTM shirt? Please advise
The differences will always be smaller than with suiting. Often the biggest difference is the ability to cut any shape of collar at all, by hand, rather then pick from a selection. Also the difficulty of finding a good, reliable MTM system
Points well taken and all true. I just ordered two test shirts from a company here in the U.S. called Individualized Shirts and am looking forward to evaluating this MTM product. Have you found a MTM system that you’re please with and can recommend?
No – I’ve tried four or five but couldn’t really recommend them
Do you mind mentioning what MTM programs you’ve tried?
It’s been a while but I’ll try to get a list.
That would be great,thank you.
Thank you for one of the most informative and important posts I have seen on the internet fashion sites. For me, material is important for comfort and how it falls on the body, but I am glad to hear it isn’t a matter of life or death.
And thanks for a great website, written for and by adults. I have noticed a lack of bad English and juvenile slang that you find on other men’s fashion sites.
Blame years as a professional journalist..
@ Rollo “And thanks for a great website, written for and by adults. I have noticed a lack of bad English and juvenile slang that you find on other men’s fashion sites.” Agreed, and Very much appreciated, Simon. It’s refreshing to be able to swiftly read through and completely understand what you’re saying, without having to mentally add or delete letters, words, and punctuation in order to try to make sense of what you’ve written–that can be annoying and exhausting, especially in a longer, detailed piece. You are an exceptional journalist in this regard; I’ve read the writing of too many journalists who do not use good writing skills, not to mention improper use of I/me, who/whom/that, etc.
I’ve, unfortunately, often been puzzled about why a few of the major blogs about style and elegance are written with poor grammar, spelling, and punctuation (I won’t go into slang or cursing). Should their attention to detail in style not extend to their written communication? Inexpensive and very good online-proofreading-software is available, and good online-proofreading services are available for around $25 an hour, or for rates by the line.
Anyway, thank again, Simon.
I would – and hopefully others – appreciate a unimportant/important list for jackets and trousers (separate as there is too much to cover under the broad term of ‘suit’). This is a great method and I agree with every point.
Thanks Sam.
Jackets are a lot harder – there are far more points relevant to construction, far greater variety in how they are done, and far greater subjectivity in assessing them. One of the reasons the piece works so well for shirts is that the answer is actually pretty simple. I will consider trousers though
Again, a really interesting piece.
Could you do something like a test, where you would for instance compare a cheap and an expensive rtw shirt with a mtm and a bespoke shirt, putting all of them to regular use?
I can certainly see why that would be useful. I don’t think I’m going to wear a RTW shirt and MTM shirt I don’t like for several months though, in order to compare how they wear over time. Sorry if that’s a bit selfish
Simon,
Would you please address the issue of collar model? For example, is there a model that you recommend for a true dress shirt? Is there a model that works well with or without a tie? What’s your opinion of spread collars etc?
Hi Scott,
Sure, I can go into that in another post. There is nothing wrong with most collars from a style point of view though, within reason. Cutaway but not extreme cutaway. As to with and without a tie, have a look at my post last week on a business casual outfit – I’ve gone into there the adjustments I’ve made with my Neapolitan button-downs so they work with both. But generally, Italian fused collars work much better across the two scenarios
Simon, in London who do you recommend for bespoke shirts? I notice you’ve mentioned experiences with T&A Bespoke and Sean O’Flynn. How does the end product compare with bespoke shirts made on the continent (e.g. Italy)? Are there any major differences?
Hey Robert – that’s a big question and there are big differences. Check out some of my previous articles on shirts first, if you wouldn’t mind. You can see them in the ‘Shirts and ties’ category at the top of the page
Thanks for this Simon, always good to have a summary!
Could you elaborate on your view that useful hand stitching would be to attach the sleeves by hand? In my experience and research, there is only the option to hand stitch the second stitching, the one folding back the excessive fabric into the shoulder. The main stitching, attaching the sleeve to the armhole is always done by machine for added strength, may it be with the big bespoke brands such as T&A or Charvet, as well as with the smaller makers I have come across here in Paris. Maybe Italians do it ?
Thanks,
LM
It’s the same process, yes. But unlike doing that on the side seam (machine then hand) it has a noticeable effect on the comfort of the shirt
Q. “what makes a quality shirt” A. Love… I have my shirts made by Robert at Dege & Skinner along with his apprentice Thomas, every shirt they cut is a labour of “Love” and is shows.
Simon,
You aren’t a fan of the extreme cutaway? Is it too showy for you?
I started wearing Purple Label Keaton collars this year and I think I am hooked…This despite a good friend jokingly calling the shirt a ‘negative spread collar’!
Not personally, but is a personal thing. The key is just to be aware that it is relatively bold – so perhaps other things could be tones down
Simon, I’m shocked.
Do you really mean that material doesn’t matter?
And in your post on Johnstons of Elgin, did they really say the difference is all in the finishing and not the raw product? They know very well that there are vastly different qualities of raw cashmere. I remember years ago buying quantities of white 100% cashmere scarves from them at 50p a go, at the same time we were paying 30 times that for the Hilltop equivalent – believe me there was a difference in the raw material.
John
Hey John, raw material certainly makes a difference, a huge one, but Graham’s point was that finishing is the biggest differentiator between companies. It’s worth stating particularly given that most consumers consider only the raw material, and never the finishing.
And yes, sorry with shirts I do think material pretty unimportant.
I was wondering if you could post what you consider to be the essencial pattern designs for dress shirts. In my modest english I’m aming at designs such as ‘bengal’, ‘gingham’ and so on. What are the textile patterns that you prefer? Thanks in advance.
[essential]
Very useful thoughts, Simon. THanks.
Any solutions for rtw collars showing fabric instead of hiding the button under the tie? This is particularly a nuisance when wearing black tie, being narrower than a tie knot.
The gap simply has to be bigger between the two sides of the collar. Worth looking out for. You can also move the collar button a bit, but only a bit
Simon, you mention that material is unimportant but that does seem to rather ignore the reality of different climates and seasons (as well as the sensual pleasure involving in wearing certain materials). For example, I live in Hong Kong and I like wearing shirts made from a relatively heavy Thomas Mason twill in the winter but find it impossibly hot in the summer when I switch to Alumo Soyella, voile, or cotton / linen blends. This might not be such a big issue in Britain but in many other places around the world the choice of material will be crucial for comfort as much as for aesthetic reasons.
Good point Jason. The post is about quality, though, and I would say the quality is largely unimportant. Slightly more important in lightweight shirts, but only slightly
Simon, thank you for your response. I’ve had a good read through past posts. However, are there any particular bespoke shirtmakers you recommend in London?
Not really Robert. I’ve used a few (all of which written on around the blog) but I don’t have shirts made in the UK anymore, so I couldn’t really recommend it.
Simon
You may be interested to look at Luxire.com
They copied a Hilditch and Key shirt for me.
Quite fantastic.
I just received a test fit shirt from Luxire. A light blue chambray button down collar.
I used measurements from a shirt I own that fits very well. The fit is fantastic and the construction and finishing are very good. And the roll of the collar is beautiful. I am impressed and have already ordered a blue spread collar shirt to replace an aging one. I am lucky to have a body that fits RTW clothing fairly well, with the exception of shirts (sleeves are too short and armholes too large).
With Luxire I’m finding that I can get shirts that fit well at a similar (or often better) price than RTW. And with such good results I don’t think I need to consider the more costly option of bespoke shirts.
I’m in my happy place.
Simon
I did not mention, when referring you to Luxire, that the first shirt they made me was formed from Alumo cloth.
They have also made me a pair of trousers from Dugdale cloth, based on some (quite detailed) measures from a pair of Graham Browne trousers.
Both are outstanding in terms of fit and make, and at prices which you would simply not believe.
It may be helpful to other readers if you were to explore a bit more widely.
Always enjoy your articles.
Thanks Nick, very interesting. Always trying, always exploring. I tend to only mention places I would recommend, but I am planning a few round-up pieces of places I wouldn’t.
Thanks for the honest comments on shirt differentiation.
Although I think you are going a little light on the importance of good shirting. The higher the super number the finer the thread but high quality shirting also has a better feel and lustre. There is a significant difference when wearing a typical high street 1/80 1/80 compared to a Thomss Mason 2/140 2/140.
Thanks. There is certainly a difference, yes. I would argue that it is one of the least important things when deciding what to spend money on in a shirt, though, and certainly among the bottom few in a bespoke wardrobe as a whole.
Hi simon
read about folded front hem somewhere. Is that a sign of a good shirt? And what about cuffs with an interlining(canvassed)?
If you mean the hem at the bottom of the shirt, I’ve not seen that. If you mean the placket that runs down the front of the shirt, that’s not necessarily a sign of quality – it is a more formal style, and takes a little more work, but that’s all.
The vast majority of cuffs, like collars, will have some kind of lining – fused or floating. The debate over which is best is the same as with collars, but far less important…
Simon
what do you prefer between fused or unfused collars and cuffs?
I know Bruce Boyer wears non fused shirts only.
A non fused shirt is harder to iron and the collar will show more wrinkles instead a fused one will look stiffer. Maybe is better to opt for a non fused shirt for more relaxed shirts and fused for dress shirts with (for example) a french collar?
A last question regarding pleats on the cuffs:
” in constant gathering like the Neapolitans do”
do you have a picture of this tecnique? I didn’t get very well what you mean.
Thank you
I wear fused – have a look at discussions of Satriano cinque…
I recently purchased a Eton shirt from Nordstrom Rack for $149.00 half of price of retail, but I returned the shirt because the collar stays were flimsy , sewn into the shirt collar and couldn’t be removed.
Can you shed some light on the quality of Eton shirts. Thanking you in advance. Irv
I’m glad to part of your family of subscribers; I really enjoy reading your e-newsletter.
Thanks Irv.
It’s very hard to speak to the quality of RTW shirts, particularly as brands switch manufacturers fairly regularly. But as a general point for RTW shirts, with most you are just paying for finer cloth, or make outside Asia
Hello there,
For a quality shirt , fabric of the is also a important thing, i think so… online tailoring is a vogue today, so every one want to design their shirt via online using shirt design tool for a perfect fitness, fabric selection etc.. all these features are available in the shirt design tool.
Thank you ..
Hi,
I wanted to know what quality of interlining is best for the fused collars(for formal shirts)? If you could share some specifications like weight or composition etc.
Thanks Simon for an excellent article. What about collar rolls and collar stays? Any tips on those important points? What about cufflinks? What are the best cufflinks and collar stays producers if that makes a difference? Thank you.
Cufflinks is a big area, see my collaboration with Diana Maynard for my views on the perfect pair.
And there is little difference between collar stays. Plastic is fine, unless you like the idea of having something precious no one will see.
Thanks again Simon, what about hand sewn cuffs and yoke (quarto spalla)? Don’t you think those are important to be done by hand? They don’t offer any functional benefit? Thank you so much.
The cuff doesn’t really. The yoke does, arguably, but not on the same scale as the collar or armhole
Thanks Simon!
I do like using aluminum alloy collar stays. They can be given a gentle curve which I think adds a nice shape to the collar.
Could you expound a bit on collar stays? Which materials are best, can you forgo them etc. I occasionally find metal ones uncomfortable when the shirt is buttoned up to the top.
I wouldnt use metal ones as yes, they can be uncomfortable and they don’t add much. Indeed, they can make the collar look a bit odd, with a hard line down the middle.
I’d use plastic ones, and forego them only if you like the look of a softer collar, often pinched a bit when worn with a tie, and with the points sometimes slipping out from under the jacket lapel
Thanks, Simon. Do you use plastic ones that came with RTW shirts or does a specific brand make them?
Just the ones that come with the shirts. Unless I think they’re particularly flimsy, in which case I might swap with ones from another shirt. I take them all out when washing anyway, so there’s a small like of them in my jewellery box
Nearly every angle explored in this piece, except for the vexing question of whether one chooses a shirt made of ‘regular’ cotton or the non-iron variety.
Clearly the labour saving of the non-iron, plus the benefit of still remaining crease free by going-home time, has its advantages. But are there disadvantages too? Breathability perhaps? What sort of magic treatment does the non-iron material undergo, are the chemicals used to coat the cotton safe and do they have any impact on the life of the shirt?
Given that so much of what is available is now non-iron only, it would be really useful to understand the pros and cons.
It’s basically the downside of synthetic materials, in whatever proportion: lack of breathability, lack of softness in feel, slight tendency to smell when sweated into…
Do you iron your shirts yourself? If so, would you care to do a post on how you go about it?
Yes, always, and sure I can at some point
Please do. I’m sure a lot of readers, myself included, would appreciate and find it interesting.
Simon, do you have a post that covers shirt thread count?
No, but we’re looking at a series currently – should be available next year.
Cheers
Hi Simon – what do you think of shirts from Emmett?
Nice, a solid make and often some interesting fabric choices
Hi Simon,
I bought some bespoke shirts, and after the first wash bubbles started to appears on the cuffs. Another bespoke shirt I own started to get bubbles on both cuff and collar after just a few wash.
Is that normal? Is there a way to get rid of those bubbles? If no, what should I do?
Thanks!
If the bubbles are on the outside that’s not good – it means the fusing is cheap and it’s coming away. Not much you can do I’m afraid… except get better quality next time, or try to take it back for a refund
Thanks for your answer.
I’ll bring this up with the tailor.
If I can afford answer: this is one of the reasons why traditional collars, not fused, are better than fused collars. But this is not emphasized quite often
I disagree, personally, Roberta. It is only cheap fusing that has this problem. Most good fused shirts (like nearly all mine) dont
Thank you Mr. Simon,
I agrre, surely a good fusing hasn’t this problem, but surely a not fused collar never has this problem.
My personal opinion is that glue ruin fabrics over time, just like starches and inadequate care. I know, not fused collars are not easy to iron and exactly how tradition is disappearing, people capable of managing traditional things are disappearing.
But despite this I think it is worth the effort to take care of it, because, beyond all the processing, decidedly more complex that hides behind un fused collar, the difference is visible wearing it, as time goes on.
But this is just my personal opinion.
Thanks for your experience Roberta.
Are quality shirts like Hawes and Curtis or T Lewin, made in UK these days?
Thank you. I enjoy learning from your knowledge.
No, I don’t think they are. You couldn’t really make shirts in the UK at those prices.
Hi Simon,
Im a relatively new reader and hence my post might be half a decade late.
You should research on the quality of interlining used in fused collars and cuffs. That makes a huge difference. True bespoke makers allow you to choose your interlining as well. Recently I chose an alumo collar interlining with my shirt and it changed the softness of my collar and cuff completely.
Thank you Saar. Don’t worry, no comments are too late.
In my experience of using different shirtmakers, most don’t want you to change interlining weights that much because they’re used to particular ones, and don’t feel confident achieving the same look with different ones. But some do of course.
Personally I find English shirtmakers, for example, are just more comfortable with stiffer linings and better at using them. And the Italians with softer linings. I’d probably change shirtmaker in that regard if I had the choice (as you do in London)
On quality, to be honest I’ve never noticed a difference in quality between different linings. But perhaps I’ve been lucky in only using the best from good shirtmakers.
Thank you for the prompt response. I am actually based out of india but have made shirts from a lot of places. I love the marol shirts but not the safari collars.
Hi Simon,
Please could you kindly share the fabric details and who made the blue chambray shirt in the first image?
Thanks
Rupesh
It was made by Simone Abbarchi and is an Oxford from the Indaco range at Thomas Mason. It’s a while ago though – I don’t think the specific cloth will still be available
Hi Simon,
The chambray shirt made by Simone Abbarchi, was the collar fused or unfused? Also what is your preference and are your bespoke shirts by Simone, Luca and Davino have unfused collars?
Thanks
Rupesh
Hi Rupesh,
All my shirts have fused collars, I prefer them. There is a certain snobbiness about fused collars because they’re easier to make, and more traditional, than unfused ones. But they mould better to the shape of your neck and the collar of the jacket, creating a much more natural look. And there’s no comfort difference.
S
Spring has sprung, and men’s thoughts turn to ….. cleaning out their winter wardrobe. Are there really no shirts that should be dry cleaned? I’m asking this question because many heavier (casual but expensive) shirts have a certain “hand” to them, which I fear could get damaged by putting them in a washing machine, even on delicate.
We’re really talking about dressier shirts here, Josh. Pay attention to the cleaning label and do dry clean if it’s advised.
The danger of dry cleaning is that it’s harsh on the materials (you’re basically doing the same gentle wash, but in chemicals rather than water) and this will cause fraying, shorten the shirt’s life etc.
However, some materials don’t react well to the combination of soap and water, and chemicals are therefore better.
Ah, the label. This is precisely the source of my confusion. The labels of most casual shirts, I find, give little guidance, saying only that you can dry clean or wash – with no indication of which method is actually preferred. I’m asking because I bought a stubby shirt, which had a label saying that I could wash it. So I did. The shirt did not fade, nor did it shrink. But the stubs disappeared — and to me, that was the point of the shirt! So I thought I should ask your advice.
Hi Simon, could I ask which fabric was used to make the shirt in the first photo?
Many thanks,
Jack
Canclini ‘denim’
Another, several page write-up about “what to look for in determining a well-made shirt of quality” is in Alan Flusser’s book Style and The Man. I’d highly recommend searching online for a copy. I realize the book is rather old, but I figure most likely the overwhelming majority of these principles and techniques have largely remained unchanged over who knows how many years, ergo the advice in this book is most likely still absolutely relevant. For example, he explains why the a buttonhole on the sleeve (not the one on the actual cuff) when sewn horizontally—rather than vertically—is more difficult, due to the fact that the person sewing has to line that hole up perfectly the hole of the button cuff, otherwise it looks sloppy and entirely off. He also explains the preference for using double-thick mother-of-Pearl buttons—and, in general, just Mother-of-Pearl buttons—over plastic buttons: when the sewing needle accidentally strikes the plastic button, the button will shatter; when said needle strikes the Mother-of-Pearl button, the needle instead will shatter. Or how the best shirtmakers will take the time to line up the patterns on the material of the upper back with the patterns on the upp aspect of the shoulder, where the two are sewn together, to make it look continuous, uniform and of a seemless transition. I seriously cannot recommend the book enough!
Thank you Jacob, I haven’t read it for years – will go back and remind myself of that section!