The enlarged, filterable Lookbook

Wednesday, September 11th 2024
Share
||- Begin Content -||

The Lookbook page on PS has long been a hidden jewel. A lot of readers find it useful but others don’t know it’s there. I blame the way people (including me) use websites today, searching and asking before reading and browsing. 

Well, the Lookbook is here, as well as under ‘Style’ in the menu, and it has had an update. You can now filter outfits by weather (winter, summer, rain, spring/autumn) and by formality. Given there are over 400 looks, you really need it now to get a sense of them. 

On the formality front, I found it best to break this down by dominant pieces of clothing. So a suit is a category, then a tailored jacket, a casual jacket, chinos, jeans, then shorts. There is overlap in this system - if a jacket is worn with jeans for instance - but it works well as a rough indicator of smartness. The same goes for seasons - neither list is mutually exclusive. 

Categorising all this has not been a small job (thank you Manish!) and adding new categories will take a while as well, but do let us know what else you might find useful. We waited until this was live deliberately to see what feedback and suggestions people had. 

There have been some other improvements too. You were always able to click on ‘Read more’ to see the article the outfit originally came from, which would usually tell you what the clothes were, as well as why I liked them. 

But you can also now select ‘Enlarge’ to get the image to fill the screen, so there’s no need to go elsewhere to get a closer look. And there are other tools in the top-right of the screen, which enable zooming and sharing. The page loading itself has also been speeded up.

As with the filtering, let us know here if there are any improvements we can make. The behaviour is slightly different on mobile compared to desktop, but both should have decent UX (my old days as a product manager coming back!).

Do also shout, obviously, if you spot any ‘shorts’ under ‘winter’ or similar. 

If you look through all the images you can slowly see my hair receding and then getting shorter. You can see me wearing glasses less. You can see my style fluctuating but also improving, I think: more tasteful and more me. 

More usefully, you can filter the page for what to wear tomorrow when it’s raining. Or, for wearing a suit and tie after two years of being entirely neckwear-naked. 

I hope it becomes another helpful resource on PS. Other hidden gems, by the way, are a series called ‘The Rules’ which counter-intuitively attempts to stop everyone using that term, and ‘The Essentials’, which is a good place to point anyone who’s new to PS. 

Enjoy. 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

74 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Markus S

Great news!

I am one of those readers who looks at the lookbook quite often. The categorisation puts it on another level and this is indeed very helpful.

JK

I also think it is an excellent resource and these enhancements are welcome. One suggestion from me: it would be extremely useful if, when you enlarged the photo, there was some text below that identified what the specific items are that you are wearing in the photo. It would make it a bit easier then having to navigate away from the lookbook to the original post and read through the article to find out.

Paul

If they’re in the underlying webpages then you could automate it, especially as many articles list at bottom.
Challenge would be where the photo is one of many on the article. As you often don’t list them all. But I reckon you can get a decent proportion with some simple code. When work is quieter I’m happy to try.

Eric Michel

I agree 100% that it would be absolutely fantastic to identify the items you are wearing directly in the lookbook as sometimes it is not even in the linked article. I would find it even more useful than the filters…

Tim J

Hey Simon,
Congratulations on the updated to the look book. That is no small undertaking given the size of the archive.
i know that adding further filters categories is no easy task, but did you consider ‘colour’ as an option? Again, it would either need to relate to the dominant / focal piece, or perhaps be restricted to warm/cool colours or complimentary colours. I just thought that might be a nice way for readers to look for pieces that work with a dominant colour.
cheers,
Tim

Mark

Thanks Simon – that makes a great resource even better.
I’d second the request for Colour and perhaps suggest Suede/Leather as an extra filter??
Sorry to add to your workload….

Sam

“Formality” might be a useful filter, that’s how I tend to mentally categorise a day’s outfit rather than colours. “Office / smart casual / casual” or something? Something to tie into previous articles on tweaking an outfit for given levels of formality.

eric-c

I’ve also used PS Lookbook the way Tim does — starting with a color in mind. So I second that suggestion. Also, all or most of your photos already describe many of the colors in your outfits — and that comes up if you use the hover feature. You likely would not have to painstakingly add tags to a lot of items — just search what is already in the description. Very useful.

Tim J

Yes agree Simon. Fabric was the other one I had in mind.

Wouter

Wow – this is impressive, very useful and just a beautiful collection of images. And I never knew it was there!
To make another comment on the archival value of your website: while looking for reviews on TLB Mallorca I stumbled on the issue of low instep – which I have in some shoes – and how this may be addressed with Skolyx tongue pads. Ended up also buying several pairs of socks from them to justify a shipment from Sweden and they appear to be great value. Particularly happy with the correct length of the non-OTC socks (mid-calf).

Lindsay McKee

A cracking improvement to a great Lookbook.
What would be your thinking if I suggested that , apart from say the outfits from Manish and your other colleagues some of the photos that readers contribute could be added, albeit only if they are suitable?
Am I asking for too much?
I love this improvement!!!

Max

if so there should be a quick filter to for example view only yours or manish ones. For Manish this would be very good because his Instagram images getting so much compression duo instagrams policy. In my view it would be nice if he had his own website, even if its just a lookbook 😉

Lindsay McKee

Hi Max. Very good point on the Instagram issues.
I don’t do “social media” as such. Possibly your suggestions could take out some of those problems.

Lindsay McKee

I understand!

Caleb C

As a regular user of the Lookbook, I love the improvements. Now I might beat my wife getting ready for date night!
I will second (or third) the suggestion on color and adding in all the photos from articles.
It is already plenty useful so those are only suggestions if you were looking to continue to expand it.

g

Maybe the reader’s argument is less about certain people (Manish or others) … but to – aesthetically and semiotically – loosen the sheer aggregation of “selfies” ?

A classified lookbook may indeed be useful, but my first impression was : as for myself, I would not stand a collection like this.

JSB

I’ve been reading PS for about 10 years and have only been using your Lookbook for the last 1 year or so. It is definitely a very good resource and I wish I used it more. It is certainly a over-lookedbook, as far as my own reading goes.

The ability to enlarge the photo and filter the entire collection in the Lookbook are both great improvements. I like these features very much and doubtless this will encourage me to use the Lookbook more. Thanks for the time that you and your team must have spent on this.

JSB

There’s always going to be a bit of selfishness about what I think might be good. I tend to wear odd trousers and shirt combo’s to work rather than suits. Therefore, a filter that shows the odd ‘Tailored trousers’ would be good I think, as you have for ‘Tailored Jackets’ already in the filter.
I think another reader has already mentioned that it would be good if you could tag or add text identifying details of specific items, although I appreciate that you frequently put this info in the main article from which the image comes but again, as has been pointed out, it’s not having to navigate away from the Lookbook that would be the help.

Merlo

I also think it’d be nice to have an odd pants category, covering pieces other than chinos and jeans. Thanks.

Misbah

Simon
I often use the main search facility but can’t recall it ever directing me to an image in the lookbook. If the pictures are now all tagged then I assume it should be relatively easy for it access?
Regards

Misbah

For clarity, yes the search function takes me to the article and hence I see the images, which of course is useful as I then get the text putting the images in context. But the search never suggested an entry in the lookbook section.

Lukas

Fantastic. Though my first use for the filter – searching for “Suits” and “Spring/Autumn” at the same time – got me (among other looks) “Shorts. With linen shirt.” So I am shouting, as requested :-).

Kent

On the new Private White VC website, there’s a good photograph of Ethan Hawke wearing the PS Donegal Overcoat. Would copyright, image rights or contracts prevent you from using it in the lookbook or in the shop?

I also draw your attention that the old website’s valuable size guides (with measurements) have been replaced by size quizes. The Donegal quiz suggested that I ( with a 42 inch chest) could get a size 4 medium which would be far too small. For comparison, the measurements in the PS shop indicate that I need at least a 5, probably a 6 if wearing a jacket under the coat. Crazy!

Max

Top notch!! 🙂 I am also one who looked the page up many times.

CK

Wow!

I hold my hands up, I had absolutely no idea this existed and I’d consider myself a long-term reader at this point.

This is just fantastic, the photography is beautiful. The filters seem particularly useful.

Well done Simon and thank you, this is going to be a brilliant point of reference!

Peter Harding

Thanks Simon
This is brilliant,very useful.
I have just had a go of the filter option and its great.
Bests Regards
Peter.

Michael

I cannot believe with the amount of time I spend on this site I’d completely missed this! I think part of the reason is that the articles are listed so helpfully and the comments are so good to read through I didn’t think to root around fully. That will change this week

Marty

This is awesome thank you!

DV

Great stuff Simon & Manish!

Found myself clicking through F/W outerwear in the lookbook for some inspiration, and am very intrigued by the Polo coat you did together with Anthology. It seems there’s only 1 post where you’ve worn it, may I ask why it doesn’t feature more often?

And if you’re looking to re-sell it, I’m very interested.

CJ

Ha! I did not know this existed, now I shall no longer trawl your Instagram to such a great extent! Thank you

Robin

Love it !
Particularly the filters.

Men are hopeless when it comes to colour so anything that lights that spark is to be welcomed.
I personally encourage friends to start off with white, blue , green on top half of body and grey, brown, navy on bottom half.

Mike

This is perfect. Thank you guys for the work you put into this.

Alex

Worth buying the PS books if you find this feature useful and haven’t purchased them already…

Ben

This is so great, Simon! This will become a handy tool in the morning, picking out my outfit, as I’ll often settle on one piece to build an outfit upon. Now I can look up your pairings with a similar piece and get some quick ideas on color combos, shoes, accessories, etc. I’ve often used Lookastic for that, which has far more terrible looks than it does good ones.

Thank you Simon and PS team. I expect to use this tool a lot.

Rowan Morrison

Link on the “tobacco cord with black jeans” pic leads to an article about a double-breasted tweed jacket.

howie

hi simon: As a new user of the lookbook (starting today!), the first item I hoped to search for was watch(es), or possibly jewelry (such as bracelets). Did I miss something, or is there the possibility of adding additional categories. If not, I have to admit the keyword search is excellent, although I wish the results could be categorized by date (newest, etc.) since a recent column sometimes causes me to dig further. Many thanks.

Noel

Fantastic Simon. I’ve often used the lookbook for inspiration but found it hard to find what I was looking for. The filters are an excellent addition.
The only suggestion I have so far, is filtering by colour (perhaps of the dominant garment?).
As the number of images grows, so will its usefulness to readers.

Tom

I’m a keen user of the lookbook so these additional filters look very useful indeed.
As someone who works in design I am very much enjoying the equally spaced borders around all the imagery

Timothy

Simon,

This is a great addition. I’d say this is the next best thing after the “Style Guide” and “Casual Style Guide”. These being offline and thus helping in de-screen-timing life. But dynamic filtering is a real value add and I think adding color would be helpful, at the top/bottom granularity level.

So you could filter for “ecru bottoms” and then select “season” and “formality” and there would be a lot of outfit ideas that would provide actionable insights into a) what to wear today and b) what items to potentially acquire to broaden the wardrobe.

All the best,
Timothy

Aj

Just wanted to let you know that the image of you wearing a charcoal high twist suit is in the winter suit section.

Johnny

Hi Simon, just an idea for a future post – do you think you could explain how each of the mills release bunches? When I go to holland and sherry or Fox (which have better sites than most mills), the bunch release schedule and naming system is quite confusing. Do they release the same bunches every season, or every year? Is it the same except different colours? For instance, the Dakota bunch that you used for your Cav twill trousers from holland and sherry is no longer, but there are Cav twills in a different bunch with a different name. It’s a bit confusing. Will they be releasing a winter bunch that people should wait for before commissioning a garment, or does it not work like that. Do some bunches exist for a few years before being replaced? And are there permanent bunches that are part of a primary collection. It all seems rather opaque.
Next, do all tailors have access to all bunches or does it work on some kind of system of scarcity where there’s only enough yardage to share with certain tailors that are prioritised? It’s hard enough to try to make decisions on what fabric to choose from a half hour appointment with a tailor – it would be great to know more about this so people can research before they get to an appointment. As in, if I knew approximately what bunch and color codes I liked from their website I could streamline and make more efficient going to the tailor and not wasting their time looking through 20 bunches.
Hope that makes sense. I know there is a cloth guide, which I’ve read, but it doesn’t seem to cover much about the naming, seasonality, availability etc of bunches and how they are released. If there is any system at all. Cheers.

Johnny

Thanks Simon. Can I also ask how the fee structure works when you use source your own cloth. I saw in one of your posts that you used an Anglo Italian cloth with a different tailor. Is this in anyway impolite or frowned upon by tailors when you source your own cloth? And if you have any guidance on how much less the bespoke fee should be if you are sending the tailor the cloth yourself. That would be useful to know.

Johnny

Thank you Simon, helpful as always.

Martin

Known generally as CMT. Most tailors will happily quote you a price on this basis but don’t expect them to pass on 100% of their savings on the cloth.

Stephen

Hi Simon,
A useful idea and very good photographs. One thought (apologies if this is raised in another comment) , perhaps have a subsection (or integrated) with some of your guest writers such as Manish who always looks good.
On a related point you haven’t done a reader profile recently although I may have missed it.
Have a good weekend.

Dave

Flawless, just flawless, Simon!