This is the second fitting on my navy three-piece suit from Chittleborough & Morgan. As with any tailor I try for the first time, I encouraged Joe (Morgan) to cut and make a suit to his style. It was interesting to see the differences from other tailors.

The first difference is rather large: the lapels. Joe, harking back to Tommy Nutter days, likes a sweeping peaked lapel, and they rather dominate the jacket. The collar is high and tight to the neck as well, partly to balance the lapels.

This extreme style stops it from being a business suit. But it will make it perfect for cocktails in the evening, with a white shirt and white handkerchief. And the waistcoat on its own will be very suitable for the office. I have written many times about the benefits of a waistcoat in the office, and Joe’s cloth back and Milanese buttonhole make this waistcoat look more like a jacket than any other. We will probably have two pairs of trousers to facilitate that multi-functional use.

In fact the most beautiful part of the suit is probably the transition from waistcoat to trouser. The way the points of the waistcoat run into the trouser pleats, lying flat against the cloth, is just lovely.

Few changes were made at my prompting. This is still essentially a basted fitting – Joe likes a lot of fittings – and these are for the tailor rather than the customer. Next time we will get to the finer points of style. For now, Joe and Michael (Browne) tinkered with the front balance and got used to quite how sloping my shoulders are. It often seems like it would be quicker to start from the vertical and work up.

Other points to notice: the lovely line of the trouser, fitting as flat to the thigh as is possible with double pleats; the close fit around the seat and small of the back; and the long, elegant skirt.

Photography: Luke Carby
Notify of

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mxolisi Ngonelo

Hi Simon,

What is the difference between a close fit and a tight fit on the seat?



And here are the artists at work!Nice! What we see already looks promising. Thanks for sharing, Simon.
Two quick remarks, though: 1. Pleats on the trousers? have you changed your mind?
2. Are the vents not long?


Thank you for this interesting report, Simon. You wrote: “This extreme style stops it from being a business suit.” I guess C&M upon request also make business suits as well or will their coats always be longer and have these impressive lapels? You also write that Joe Morgan likes a lot of fittings. Why is that and what is a lot?


Simon, what tie is that you’re wearing?

Aidan Keen

Fantastic article Simon, I really appreciate how many tailors you frequent and that you let them have a go at making a Jacket in there style, at least for the first one. Gives those who either because of geography or economy may never have the chance.
One question what are the differences between a pair of trousers cut to be worn with Braces vs those without? If you have already gone over this please point me in the right direction otherwise it may provide inspiration for a future article.


Hi Simon,

how many bespoke suits do you own?



The trousers definitely look very sleek about the seat, but shouldn’t they be about a quarter-inch longer, so they don’t appear to float so much above the shoes? Michael Browne’s trousers in the last picture seem to be closer to the ideal break.

And while you don’t have a full fishtail back to the trousers, did you consider a small break in the waistband at the top to provide a little give as you sit down?

The lapels are really quite extraordinary: I would consider them excessive, like the massive fins on 1950s cars that would overwhelm the entire car.


Simon. The whole look is fantastic. Have you chosen lining yet?


That has a lovely silhouette to it. I also like the turnback cuffs of the tailor’s shirt; VERY nice.

Do you intend eventually to use every tailor on the row Simon? Experiences at Kilgour, Nortons and Richard James (bespoke) would be very interesting additions.