Introducing: The Bruce short
The new PS shorts are live today and they are – as one reader cunningly guessed – a continuation of our popular Bruce chinos launched in the spring.
This was done for two reasons. One, we love the material and casual feel of the chinos so much; and two, it makes sizing a lot easier for everybody, as they can buy the same size in shorts as they did in the chinos.
Indeed, they can buy the same colour if they wish, as the beige and khaki that the PS shorts come in are the same shades. Those two are so perfect, so exactly what we wanted.
We also added a dark menswear navy that I know will be popular. Navy is more useful as a short than a trouser, in my experience, but if pushed I can see us also doing a navy version of the chino later in the year, if there’s a lot of demand. Let me know.
So, the shorts are available in the same range of sizes and are, like the chinos, a comfortable and easy fit. I wouldn’t recommend picking your size based on what you had in the old PS shorts, as they were a rather different fit (slimmer, lower, pleated).
The shape of the new shorts was also inspired by an old US military pair that I had and featured on PS in the past. That helped determine things like the leg opening and the inseam. It’s so much easier when you have a vintage garment you already like, and can carry across little pieces of them.
So the shorts have an 14.5cm (5.7 inches) inseam in the size 48 that I wear (above) which is a nice mid-point - not the traditional Bahama dress short that ends on the knee, but not the scandalous-when-you-sit 3 inches either.
On Lucas, pictured below, in a size 54, that inseam rises slightly to 16cm.
And the leg opening is comfortable and wide without being too much. On me that’s 32cm, on Lucas 35cm.
One note here – when you first get the shorts, I find they can feel a little wide because they’re pressed flat. If you give them a little iron to get rid of the hard fold on the seam, or just fold them as you would do suit trousers, you’ll get a better sense of the shape.
Like the chinos, the sizes on the shorts are based off the chest size of a jacket, which is how the industry does it for trousers, though when you come to think of it, it doesn’t make much sense. Everything is inherited from suit systems, essentially.
Any discerning customer like the PS reader is going to look at the size chart though, and the waist measurement there is the best place to start. My waist measures just under 34 inches, and that’s why I take the size 48 in the shorts and chinos, which has a 34-inch waist.
We've expanded the range of sizes considerably, so hopefully there's one for everyone. Note that the volumes in the smaller sizes will not be large.
As ever, we’ve taken some pictures here to show how the shorts look, but also what we’d wear them with.
We talked in the chinos article about how versatile this particular shade of beige is, and while it goes well with lots of other more obvious things - whites, blues, navy, bright colours - it also looks good with black, showing how muted and cold a colour it is.
That’s the black hand-framed cotton sweater from PS I’m wearing, with our boat shoes too and Jacques Marie Mage sunglasses.
With the khaki/olive colour (below) I’m wearing an old Ralph Lauren popover of mine - actually something that, I now realise, I also showed with the old PS shorts as well. Such a creature of habit.
Finally Lucas, in his more relaxed way, is wearing the dark navy with a Rubato work shirt and dark-brown City-Mocs from Saman Amel.
Come to think of it, that’s basically the same top I’m wearing - cream, textured, untucked. Perhaps we’ve started to dress like each other.
On the navy, note that the colour will fade a little over time, but not a lot, as the material has already been pre-washed.
Product summary:
- Cotton chino short in a strong right-hand twill
- Comfortable cut with a straight leg
- Pre-washed so no shrinkage
- Slant pockets, coin pocket, open back pockets
- Split waistband to make them easier to alter
- Three colours, beige, navy and khaki
- Made in Italy by East Harbour Surplus
- Available only on Permanent Style
Sizing:
- Simon is wearing a size 48 in the beige and khaki, Lucas is wearing a size 54 in the navy
- The size refers to a corresponding suit jacket, but best is to work off the waist size in the chart below. Simon’s waist, for example, measures just under 34 inches
- If you are between sizes, we recommend taking the larger size and altering the waist to bring it in, or using a belt
- Note that the shorts are hemmed rather than unfinished in the leg (unlike the chinos) to the lengths listed below
cm
| 42 | 44 | 46 | 48 | 50 | 52 | 54 | 56 | |
| Front rise | 30 | 30.5 | 31 | 31.5 | 32 | 32.5 | 33 | 33.5 |
| Waist | 74 | 78 | 82 | 86 | 90 | 94 | 98 | 102 |
| Hip | 48 | 50 | 52 | 54 | 56 | 58 | 60 | 62 |
| Thigh | 30.5 | 31.5 | 32.5 | 33.5 | 34.5 | 35.5 | 36.5 | 37.5 |
| Hem | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 |
| Inside leg | 13 | 13.5 | 14 | 14.5 | 15 | 15.5 | 16 | 16.5 |
inches
| 42 | 44 | 46 | 48 | 50 | 52 | 54 | 56 | |
| Front rise | 11.8 | 12.0 | 12.2 | 12.4 | 12.6 | 12.8 | 13.0 | 13.2 |
| Waist | 29.1 | 30.7 | 32.3 | 33.9 | 35.4 | 37.0 | 38.6 | 40.2 |
| Hip | 18.9 | 19.7 | 20.5 | 21.3 | 22.0 | 22.8 | 23.6 | 24.4 |
| Thigh | 12.0 | 12.4 | 12.8 | 13.2 | 13.6 | 14.0 | 14.4 | 14.8 |
| Hem | 11.4 | 11.8 | 12.2 | 12.6 | 13.0 | 13.4 | 13.8 | 14.2 |
| Inside leg | 5.1 | 5.3 | 5.5 | 5.7 | 5.9 | 6.1 | 6.3 | 6.5 |


































Hi Simon,
Great timing as I was looking for new shorts, and especially in navy so happy you’ve gone with them as well!
I am inbetween 38 and 40 in the dimensions apart from the waist which seems very large at 86cm for a size 38..do you think the size 40 waist could be taken in to around 85cm or would that be too much and ruin the shape?
I think 5cm would be a little too much, yes Chris. I’d recommend no more than 3.5 probably, an inch and a half.
Hi Simon, these look great. I know you have given sizing information in this article but would you say that you could order the same size that you are in the regular Bruce Chino?
Thanks Ryan, and yes absolutely
Thanks Simon. I also want to throw a vote for navy in the Bruce chinos in the future.
Done!
Beautiful shorts! I placed my order as soon as I saw it. Hope you will make the chinos in navy as well. Regards Theodor
Thanks for the vote Theodor!
New watch, Simon?
No that’s Lucas! Great strap on that one, he got it from ABP when we visited
Love this – so helpful, particularly due to time constraints I prefer a casual wardrobe; and love how all the pieces fit together a nonchalant way. While still being easy to fit with other styles.
Love love that RL popover, you own a few of these in chambrey, or other materials. Maybe one for the P.S road map…!?
Yes, already in our thoughts Chris
Hey Simon,
Just wanted to say the quality and level of thought that has gone into PS products lately, and as always, has been outstanding. These are no exception. Thank you as well for offering a wide array of sizes, always helpful. All three colours ordered!
So nice to hear to so Dan, thank you
I an increasingly like a navy chino. Can be a more elegant (right word?) backdrop when not wearing tailoring on the top half. Not sure about them as a separate for a sports jacket, but I like to wear them with an oxford and a jungle jacket for eg as a way to dress practically but keep a reference to formality in there.
Will
Nice, yes good worn like that WJE
I vote for navy chinos too
Noted!
Belt loops, correct? Thanks
Yes
Beige and khaki ordered! Does this mean the chinos are also about to be restocked?
Hey John, we’ve produced a very small size run of the chinos alongside the pre-order which we hope to put on sale sometime in July. We’ll likely announce via the Shop Newsletter when that becomes available.
Given climate change I wondered if linen might become more popular as a material for shorts?
I’ve had linen in the past and not found it that much cooler to be honest. It doesn’t make so much difference in a short. And the look in a cotton is nicer for me
Cotton linen can work I think but only pretty casual. I have two old pairs from Luca faloni that are great for loafing. Discontinued I think (presumably the market disagreed with me)
These look just perfect! Great timing with weather you organised for the launch too!!
Question- I often buy Jeans, Shorts etc. based on the flat lay, 1/2 waist measurement. Which is not equal to 1/2 waist circumference, or so I’m led to believe by the various ecom menswear sites that I buy from. Are you able to publish the flat lay, 1/2 waist measurements please? That would be really helpful!
Many thanks
Yes, sorry to everyone for the punishing weather right now, but we thought it was worth it for this launch.
To be honest Nathan, I don’t know why the half waist would be different. Sometimes if the back and front rise are very different, and they measure just across the back, the two could be different, but usually they wouldn’t be. In any case, here they are the same
Perfect, thanks Simon!
Hope you’re all keeping cool!
Hi Simon,
These look great! I purchased a pair in khaki!
Question – do you think the PS finest polo is too smart to wear with these shorts?
Thank you!
It’s not the natural partner, as it’s a little smarter, but it’s worth trying. I’ve tried some colours like the brown and grey with more casual things recently and it can work – helps if other things bring up the smartness level, eg a loafer rather than a trainer
Gotcha, thank you!
Hi Simon,
Love the shorts – can I check what the measurements of the waistbands of the shorts themselves for each size is? Apologies if this is already in the table – I wasn’t clear if the inch measurements were for my waist, my hip etc. or those of the shorts.
No worries John. The table shows the measurements for the shorts themselves, in cm and then inches, not yours
The shorts look very nice, do they fit to someone who lifts weights or are they going to be too tight ? I have the same problem with many shorts.
They’re pretty roomy in the thigh and opening, so I think they should be fine. Lucas has pretty wide thighs and they worked on him – we actually talked about this and he was moving around testing them!
Of course you can also compare them to shorts you have and see how much extra room there is
Hey Simon,
The shorts look fantastic, and a perfect compliment to the chinos – great work!
And while the opportunity is here, I’m going to cast my vote for the chinos in that same beautiful navy, already looking forward to them.
Thanks,
CK
Cheers CK
I do hope there is consideration in the future for multiple lengths of inseams. This trend in menswear of having such short inseams is not great.
Thanks Scott, but no we wouldn’t do multiple inseams. Our shorts actually used to be longer, but we find this is a good mid-point for everyone
best is a unfinished seam if poibble from a garment perspective 🙂
Thanks Max. There would certainly be benefits to that, yes, though I’m not sure everyone would want to hem shorts themselves, and it is more of a style decision with shorts, in contrast to trousers. To me it’s more similar to the style decisions the brand makes with fit and silhouette generally, except in extreme cases of height etc
Yes I have the first version of the shorts which were fantastic and i bought the updated version last summer and unfortunately find them unwearable. Thanks for the response.
No worries Scott
Navy chinos would be great.
Another vote for the chinos in navy please, Simon!
Sold out in 12 hours, at least in my size, in all three colours. Are you struggling to get volume or just being cautious? Look great, missed out on the chinos and restock too
I think it’s because you’re at the more extreme end of the fit spectrum Bob – I assume you take 56? That’s the only size that’s sold out I think.
Those extreme sizes are always going to be more volatile in terms of availability because it never makes sense to order large volumes of them – we’ve done that before and been left with a fair bit of unsold stock (eg small cashmere rugbys).
We’re also trying to cater to a large range of people, and that makes volumes harder and more risky. Most places wouldn’t offer eight different sizes in a short – that’s a big range
What I take is fairly variable but I was looking at the 56 as I assumed yours would be less generous than others. I know you give the measurements but I have 3 garments all stated to be the same measurements from different brands and the fits are very different.
Drakes I take a UK 38, Levis a UK 36, Trunk I have both IT56 and IT54 one being definitely too loose and the other being a little tight
Think “extreme” is a little harsh
Ha! Sorry Bob, towards the manlier end of the scale? That’ll probably get me in trouble as well…
I wouldn’t assume ours would be less generous than most. If anything I’d say these are more than most. But in any case, I’d go off the measurements first and foremost rather than making an assumption one way or the other
Great news. I’ve struggled to find the right shorts. The old PS one were too, uhm, posh (?) for my liking with the plead and the length and the slimness. I like shorts to be a bit bigger, more casual in shape and size, but can never really find the right quality. I have half a dozen of >10 year old J Crew shorts I resort to every year but they’re starting to look really bad. Ordered two and look forward to testing them this summer. Never heard of the maker but sounds interesting – might order some of their own products at some point 🙂
Hey Simon & Lucas,
Hope you are both well. I’ve been loving the Bruce chinos – really good fit / silhouette for me as most things I’ve found in recent years are either too slim, or too voluminous. I’ve been in the market to replace some shorts, and actually took to cutting down a pair of RL chinos for the summer just gone.
I know some other readers have commented below, but if these were a little longer (say 8 to 8.5 inches on the inseam), I would buy all 3 x colours. That length sits above the knee on me, but provides a little more coverage – perfect for someone over the age of 50.
I also know one of the other readers commented on the thought / consideration that has gone into the recent PS releases, and echo those sentiments. Would have selfishly loved these a little longer. I think it’s why I don’t wear a previous iteration of the PS shorts from a few years ago (too short in the leg, and tight in the thigh).
Cheers,
Tim.
Thanks Tim, that’s very helpful. I think it’s going to make sense for us to stick with this inseam, but it is genuinely useful to know where readers find they’re outside the spectrum of the fit or prefer something different
Cheers Simon, and I completely understand the rationale in looking for the mid point that suits the majority of buyers. You and I are a similar height, so I know you can visualise where day and 8 inch inseam will land. I know the thigh is generous enough the chino to work nicely. I just have a preference for a slightly longer leg length in my shorts these days. A brand I used to buy used 8” as their stock length and it worked well for me.
Absolutely love the finest knitwear and Bruce chinos.
Cheers Tim, and good to hear
Hi Simon, I received khaki and beige versions today; both look great! I do find them a little tight in the waist and have bought the next size up. I assume I shouldn’t expect any noticeable give in the waist?
I’m usually a solid 33 inch waist/size 48 so I am surprised that these are tight.
Also, that khaki colour is lovely!
I wouldn’t expect much give, no John.
Glad to hear you like it!
Simon, I don’t know what the UK is like in this arena, but my shoes have to be “barefoot” (I am in the rural US). Let me know if you are familiar at all. Regular dress shoes are just off the table for me. So, I have basically found that the there are only a few quality and sartorial-leaning brands, just based off research except one. Freeform, The Last Shoemaker, Tomas Sullivent, Guacho Ninja. The first two make the attempt to not look “barefoot”. I own the Freeform chukka in Waxy Commander suede, which I really enjoy. I question though how much smarter it can go beyond chinos with an OCBD and chore jacket. Based on your guidance, I feel a brown suede loafer would probably go the furthest with my daily wardrobe (98% what I mentioned above, 2% smarter than that). I feel what would look most the part for the culture around me, which is not sartorially interested in the slightest so I don’t desire to draw too much attention, are the loafers from Freeform, T.S., or G.N.. My first inclination is the Freeform, but I am a bit put off my the sole for a loafer.
I don’t mean to make this such an in depth question, but I am stuck as to what would be the best choice here, and none would be a super cheap mistake if were to regret my choice. If you have the time, I’d appreciate the advice on this one.
https://thelastshoemaker.com/skeldergate
https://freeformshoes.com/products/penny-loafer
https://gaucho.ninja/collections/barefoot-shoes/products/goodyear-welted-barefoot-shadow-loafers-brown-xw
https://shop.sullivent.com/products/the-apollo?variant=50367125586235
I don’t know much in this area, Graden, but of those the Freeform is definitely the best-looking shoe, so I’d go with that.
Also, it might be worth looking at the Alden modified last, as it corrects some similar things to this. A suede derby on the modified would hold your foot really well and might have enough shape too. Talk to Moulded Shoe in New York about it if you haven’t already, as all they do is focus on shoes like this, but more elegant ones than the brands you have listed
please not. this is in my eyes just an bad answer for ill fitting shoes. You dont get a halux toe if you have a correct last which works for your feet.
also the fear of the heel comes from the barefoot marketing. a heel is often not that bad. I see sometimes its nice to have none but in a loafer or generally dressier styled shoes it makes no sense getting rid of the heel.
Like simon said, try alden, also der military last is very forgiven, have a look for monsun last. For sure keep your foot healthy if thats for you a nice way than keep going 🙂
One other thing – the Cantilever last from Viberg is similar to the Alden modified one, but not as extreme, if you want something in between
There is the option to select a 4mm or 15mm heel from Freeform. It changes the rest of the sole to a different style. Still rubber I believe. I think I’d prefer a leather sole in a loafer.
I don’t think I’ve seen Alden make a penny loafer in the modified last. Probably why Simon mentioned the derby
Yes they tend to make only derbys and boots, because the point is to provide good hold and room for the foot, and you just can’t do that to the same extent in a loafer
Right now there is a public mainstream media (not menswear) discussion, especially in France it seems, even in their parliament, whether shorts should be allowed in the parliament and in professional working environments for men in general. What
s your current take on this, Simon? I am sure it was discussed some time elsewhere. Sorry for that. I personally love wearing shorts during leisure time (rather short ones, not knee-length, and always with a long sleeve shirt/polo if I can). At work I would not. With this topic the following points come to my mind: (1) In times of full equality, I, as a man dont want to have to justify wearing shorts. (2) Shorts are dangerous for most men from a style point of view because the outfits end up ugly most of the time. (3) The discussion completely ignores that the problem about full-length pants is not the length but skinny cuts and fabrics are. Most men, as we here know, would be better advised looking for some wider cut linen or high twist-pants or chinos. (4) It often feels like an out of touch standpoint to suggest that men should stick to suits and ties in a 40 degree heat-wave. Those people drive from their air-conditioned homes in air conditioned cars to their air conditioned offices and don`t have to take their kids to Kindergarten with public transportation.(Apparently public servants in Tokyo are officially encouraged to wear shorts: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/apr/24/tokyo-workers-asked-to-swap-suits-for-shorts-to-combat-energy-costs-and-heat )
Not directly related but thought of this when seeing the short. When you get chinos hemmed, do you instruct the tailor to double up the fabric all the way so it’s a full 3 layers of fabric or 2 layers and a bit of fold (like these shirts looks to be) . Sorry hard to explain in words, hope you understand what I mean
I do. Usually two layers and a bit of fold. You don’t need three
Hi Simon, could you possibly explain this a little more? Im waiting for my pair of Bruce’s to be delivered so this would really help! From the OP comment is it simply a single main internal fold with then a much smaller additional fold on the back of that to avoid any fraying material edges inside of the main fold?
Thanks
Yes that’s right Nick. Let me know if anything still isn’t clear. It’s a pretty standard way to finish a trouser inside so I don’t think you’ll have any issues specifying it (and would also probably get it even if you didn’t ask)
Jumping on this thread as it seems relevant to my question – I’ve just received my shorts which are perfect for me in terms of style, colours, roominess through the thigh and at the hem, however I think I would like like them to be an inch longer (and I note the many interactions you’ve had in the threads above), would you say it’s possible to lengthen by an inch without ruining them?
Thanks again and I hope to snag a pair of the chinos as I was sceptical at the point of their release but now I think they’d work for me!
Hey Sean,
No I’m afraid not – because they’re garment washed to get them that softness, there will be a faint faded line on the bottom edge, which you would see if you lengthened them.
If you look at that edge, you will be able to see the fading line. It won’t be strong, so if you’re happy with that you can go ahead, but that’s what you will get.
Was thinking about if that ”bit of fold” go all the way to the bottom or stop half way between the seam and bottom edge … I find that if halfway you sometimes get a faded line showing where the inside fold is , showing through on the outside after some pressing. Any way to avoid that?
You would avoid it if the fold inside does go to the bottom, but you can also do so by not pressing there hard.
I wouldn’t worry about it too much either way though – they are cotton and will look better the more they show little signs of age and wearing in
Hi Simon,
I’ve received my pair of shorts and the fit is nice and comfy. However seemingly contrary to other readers here, is it possible to shorten the shorts slightly? At the moment I’m testing them out simply folded back on the seam but I’m not sure if this is acceptable seeing as it’s a false turn up. Cheaper than having them altered though!
True!
If you’re shortening them that much, though, I would alter them yes, and it should be easy to do. If you shortened them by less than the length up to the stitch line, you would get faint stitching holes, but if shortening as much as you are, you wouldn’t even get that
just got mine yesterday, size 44 which fits me perfectly. But just been looking how you style them, and got a stupid question- you don’t use a belt with them, even if there are beltloops?
Don’t worry Frank, no stupid questions!
I do both, sometimes a belt and sometimes not. Like a pair of jeans, shorts without a belt can look fine, almost more relaxed. Also, on a hot day sometimes you want to avoid that extra layer at the waist if the fit is good enough
Hi Simon, I received my shorts the other day and am very pleased with the fit and colours. Just wanted to mention that they are definitely accommodating for people with larger thighs.
A bit off topic for this thread but would you know of a brand that sells swimming trunks/shorts in a similar fit to these shorts (room in the seat and thighs)?
I don’t actually Ryan, but it has been one I’ve been meaning to look into. I’ll shout if I find one
Hello Simon. Received my Bruce chinos today and love them. Is there any chance of a re-stock on these shorts?
Hey David, glad to hear it! Unfortunately, we likely won’t restock them until next summer