This past weekend I wrote a piece for the FT on polo shirts, which you can see here. Mentioning John Smedley, Orlebar Brown, Lacoste and others, it is hopefully an interesting update for anyone interested in the menswear staple.
Related posts
I sent Ben from Stitchdown a rundown. It was a little more shoe-focused. Happy to forward it or post it if you want.
London: A sartorial city guide
Read the commentsNo worries
Rubato officer’s chinos: Review
Read the commentsThanks Nick, no I haven't but it's a good point. On access to the cloth, it's unlikely to happen unless someone is happy to stump up for a lot of metres and buy it outright - basically, become a merchant to the mill.
Husbands: Still sexy after all these years
Read the commentsYes - a little smart, but they work well
Cavalry twill for trousers
Read the comments
Nice article, but I think your FT editor has fumbled a couple of times.
7th graf: Some brands have gone further, exploring a knitted alternative to the polo’s traditional woven cotton fabric. ” Traditional polo fabric is knit pique, of course, as you note in the 2nd graf.
Also 7th graf: “The advantage of a knitted, fine-gauge polo, as opposed to cotton, is that it can hold its shape and incorporate formal tailoring elements, such as backward-sloping shoulder seams.” Should this be about fine gauge cotton knit vs cotton knit pique, or is the new fabric a silk, linen or wool?
You’re right Mack, that is an error. The difference with the Smedley and other knits is that they are not cut-and-sewn, but knitted as fully fashioned pieces. This avoids the bulky seams, boxy shape and boardy feel of cheaper polos.
Yes, I have all the kinds. And Smedley itself has made all kinds. Most of my Smedley cotton polos are of fully-fashioned jersey, but a few old ones made for the Richetti store in Parma are of pique, cut-and-sewn.